Case 3301630/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Hall v Omnitude Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3301630/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment after Omnitude Limited failed to enter a response. Pursuant to Rule 21(2), Employment Judge R Lewis found Miss N Hall's claims for breach of contract, holiday pay and unpaid wages well founded.
The respondent was ordered to pay a total of £4,356.84. The judgment broke that figure down as £2,500.00 for arrears, £1,153.85 for holiday pay, and £702.99 for notice pay. No interest, basic award, compensatory award, or injury to feelings award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as unpaid wages and the remedy schedule labels it arrears. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,154 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a breach of contract claim and awards notice pay; the text does not separately label notice pay as wrongful dismissal. | Upheld | — | £703 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,357
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
- Rule 21(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.