Case 3301636/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Wakil Ms S Khan v Education Dreams Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3301636/2023
- Decision date
- 23 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Wakil Ms S Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment under rule 37. The Tribunal identified two claims, brought by Ms S Wakil and Ms S Khan against Education Dreams Ltd, and recorded that they appeared to be an abuse of process. By a letter dated 24 January 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant(s) until 13 February 2024 to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out.
No representations were made in writing and no hearing was requested. The Tribunal therefore struck out each claim. The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of the underlying claims and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal sent a letter on 24 January 2024 inviting representations or a hearing request by 13 February 2024 because the claims appeared to be an abuse of process; no representations were received. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Claim struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal sent a letter on 24 January 2024 inviting representations or a hearing request by 13 February 2024 because the claims appeared to be an abuse of process; no representations were received. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.