Case 3301650/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Addo v UK South Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301650/2024
- Decision date
- 14 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Addo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Reading by CVP on 18 September 2025 before Employment Judge Anstis. The claimant did not attend and was not represented, but provided written representations. The respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claimant’s claims were struck out.
The written record does not give the substantive reason for the strike-out and notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision. It also records that the respondent did not pursue its costs application at the hearing, without prejudice to any further costs application that might be made under rule 75.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims were struck out and does not specify the individual claim particulars; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing for the case. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claims were struck out and does not specify the individual claim particulars; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing for the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.