Case 3301673/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Allen v Thai Foods Centre Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301673/2023
- Decision date
- 6 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunals on 5 February 2023 and the respondent did not present a response. The Employment Judge therefore made a determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s daily pay was £92.38, calculated by reference to gross monthly pay divided by 4.33 working weeks per month and 5 working days per week. It held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in relation to pay for 13.5 days of holiday accrued but untaken on termination of employment.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,247.13. The judgment was dated 6 December 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of 13.5 days of untaken holiday on termination, calculated using a daily pay figure of £92.38. | Upheld | — | £1,247 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,247
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.