Case 3301675/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Rudd v Crossacre Tippers Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3301675/2023
- Decision date
- 22 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Rudd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim on the papers under Rule 21. It found that Mr C Rudd was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered Crossacre Tippers Limited to pay damages of £5,200.00. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning on the notice claim beyond that finding.
The tribunal also found that Mr Rudd was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,568.00. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other claims are recorded in the judgment. The combined monetary total shown by the two awards is £9,768.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £5,200.00. | Upheld | — | £5,200 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,568.00. | Upheld | — | £4,568 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,768
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.