Darren Davis v OSC Group Holdings — 2026

Case reference: 3301702/2026
Decision date: 8 July 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Graham

Indexed: 22 September 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Darren Davis

Respondent

OSC Group Holdings

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Darren Davis's claim against OSC Group Holdings was struck out. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 7 April 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it appeared that the claim had not been actively pursued. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant did not reply.

Employment Judge Graham found that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 applied and that strike-out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The judgment was approved on 8 July 2026. No monetary award was recorded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the claim's legal basis. The supplied listing categorises it as unfair dismissal, but this is not confirmed in the judgment text.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.