Case 3301703/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Veltkamp Mr R Ferreira Mr R Dolz Mr M Lerwell Mr R Owen v Go2 Engineering Group Limited (in liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3301703/2023
- Decision date
- 12 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr C Veltkamp Mr R Ferreira Mr R Dolz Mr M Lerwell Mr R Owen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered a grouped case under numbers 3301703/2023 to 3301707/2023 brought by Mr C Veltkamp, Mr R Ferreira, Mr R Dolz, Mr M Lerwell and Mr R Owen against Go2 Engineering Group Limited (in liquidation) and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. The judgment does not describe the underlying substantive causes of action, and instead addresses case management only.
By a letter dated 29 November 2023, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Judge Foxwell struck out the claim. No remedy, award, or further substantive findings were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it states only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.