Mr R Coscia v Deltone Construction — 2024

Case reference: 3301711/2023
Decision date: 26 November 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Quill Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr R Coscia

Respondent

Deltone Construction

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a strike out judgment in the claim of Mr R Coscia against Deltone Construction. By a letter dated 3 September 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 24 September 2024 to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 11 April 2023 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make any written representations and did not ask for a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability or any monetary remedy.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The claim was struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal's letter dated 3 September 2024 gave the claimant until 24 September 2024 to make representations or request a hearing. The claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing. The reasons stated that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 11 April 2023 and had not actively pursued the claim.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.