Case 3301739/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301739/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Members
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Mr C Davie, Mr S Holford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mrs Lydia Grossman-Kovacs, brought complaints of constructive unfair dismissal and race discrimination against Cambridgeshire Community Services NHS Trust. The judgment states that both complaints were not well founded and were dismissed.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's full reasons. It notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and the written record is a short dispositive summary only. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The written record states the claimant's complaint that she was constructively unfairly dismissed was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The written record states the claimant's complaint that she was unlawfully discriminated against on the grounds of race was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.