Case 3301741/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Hurst v Milton Bayer Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301741/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hanning
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Hurst
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote hearing at Watford before Employment Judge Hanning sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr G Lomas. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal found that Mrs N Hurst was an employee of Milton Bayer Limited during the period 31 July 2017 to 31 October 2017. On that basis, it held that it had jurisdiction to consider her unfair dismissal claim. The written judgment does not contain any merits decision on whether the dismissal was fair or unfair, and it records no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record only decides that the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant was an employee in the period 31 July 2017 to 31 October 2017. It does not record a merits finding on dismissal or any remedy. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.