Case 3301797/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Marques v Buon Appetito Reading Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3301797/2023
- Decision date
- 13 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Marques
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 10 February 2023. The tribunal recorded that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and, under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, determined the claim without a response from the respondent.
The tribunal found that Buon Appetito Reading LTD had made unauthorised deductions from Mr R Marques's wages. It therefore ordered the respondent to pay £4,630.77 in respect of the wages deduction claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £3,692.31 for that claim. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or any other remedy beyond these sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £4,631 |
| Holiday pay | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £3,692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,323
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.