Case 3301812/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Ayyashi v El Cerdo Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301812/2025
- Decision date
- 25 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Ayyashi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 25 March 2025 against El Cerdo Ltd (in voluntary liquidation). The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a judgment could properly be made on the available material.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages (£2,663.50 gross) and had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement (£500 gross).
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £3,163.50 in total.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 default judgment. Unauthorised deductions from wages (gross). | Upheld | — | £2,664 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 22 default judgment. Unpaid holiday entitlement (gross). | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,164
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.