Case 3301813/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Martin v Renald Hotels Limited& Others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3301813/2020
- Decision date
- 11 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Martin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the claimant was Miss T Martin and the respondent was Renald Hotels Limited & Others. The tribunal stated that the respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements to the claimant.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £797.14. No further reasons, findings of fact, or separate legal analysis were recorded in the extracted text.
Because the decision is a short default-style judgment, the record does not specify any split between different heads of loss or any additional remedy components beyond the single sum ordered.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment. The decision states that the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements to the claimant and orders payment of £797.14, but it does not set out a fuller legal basis for the award. | Upheld | — | £797 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £797
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £797
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.