Case 3301820/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Hamilton v Healthcare Homes Group Ltd & others — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301820/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Hamilton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy order dated 8 February 2021, the Tribunal gave Miss L Hamilton an opportunity to make written representations as to why the claim should not be struck out after she had failed to attend a hearing without reasonable excuse. The order recorded that the Tribunal was concerned the claim was not being actively pursued, and also noted that the claimant had previously been on a strike-out warning.
The claimant did not provide written representations in response to that order. Her email of 22 February 2021 said she had been dealing with personal matters since the hearing, that she did not think she had to attend, and that she had no information to provide beyond what she had already given. The Tribunal said that was not acceptable and that the claims were not in a form that could be responded to.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. It also recorded that any further hearings listed would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a rule 37 strike-out decision and does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.