Case 3301828/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Biber & Others v Proactive It Support Limited Mr Prathapan Ravindran — 2020
- Case reference
- 3301828/2020
- Decision date
- 8 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Biber & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis Rule 21 judgment found for the claimant on all pleaded matters recorded in the decision. The tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and had suffered unlawful deductions from wages. It also found that the claimant had not been provided with a written or adequate pay statement.
The tribunal did not determine the financial remedy in this judgment. It recorded that the claim succeeded and that remedy would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing, with the claimant to file and serve a schedule of financial loss and supporting documents by 12 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant suffered unlawful deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant had not been provided with a written or adequate pay statement; this claim succeeded, but no separate remedy amount was assessed in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.