Case 3301831/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages and breach-of-contract claims against Bibby Co Ltd
The extracted text contains no narrative reasons, findings of fact, or itemised breakdown of the sum.
- Case reference
- 3301831/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Deller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge R Lewis Date ordered Bibby Co Ltd to pay Miss D Deller £461.00. The extracted text contains no narrative reasons, findings of fact, or itemised breakdown of the sum.
The GOV.UK listing for the decision records the jurisdiction codes as breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages, but the written record supplied here does not specify how the £461 is allocated between those heads of claim. The judgment was dated 1 September 2020 and sent to the parties on 6 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | GOV.UK lists this decision under breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. The extracted Rule 21 judgment only records a single order to pay £461.00 and does not apportion the sum between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | GOV.UK lists this decision under breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. The extracted Rule 21 judgment only records a single order to pay £461.00 and does not apportion the sum between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £461
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.