Case 3301833/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr Kularatne (director of the company) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301833/2020
- Decision date
- 20 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Wood Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a single breach of contract claim concerning notice pay. The claimant said he was not given notice until 31 October 2019 and was therefore owed one month’s wages in lieu of notice from that date. The respondent relied on a termination letter dated 1 October 2019, signed by Mr Kularatne and witnessed on 7 October 2019, and a further letter dated 16 October 2019 said to refuse an extension of the notice period.
The tribunal heard oral evidence from the claimant and Mr Kularatne but neither party had complied with directions: no witness statements were produced, the respondent’s bundle was not paginated, and the claimant’s documents were not available in an accessible format. The tribunal therefore decided the case without the claimant’s documents and considered it disproportionate to adjourn given the modest issues in dispute.
On the evidence available, the tribunal preferred Mr Kularatne’s account and found that notice had been given on 7 October 2019. It therefore found that the claimant was dismissed on 31 October 2019 having received his contractual notice entitlement up to that date, but that he remained entitled to 7 days of notice pay. The reasons calculate that entitlement as £436.16 using the respondent’s net monthly pay figure, while the judgment section orders payment of £436.17 net of tax.
The claimant did not pursue any other causes of action at the hearing, and any other claims were dismissed for completeness.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim allowed in part. The judgment section orders £436.17 net of tax, while the reasons section calculates £436.16 for seven days' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £436 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £436
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.