Case 3301836/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Husbands v And Tesco Stores Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301836/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Husbands
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 27 October 2020 the tribunal wrote to Mr C Husbands to say that an Employment Judge was considering striking out the claim because he had not complied with the tribunal order dated 16 April 2020 and the claim had not been actively pursued. He was given until 24 November 2020 to object in writing or request a hearing, but he did not respond.
The judgment was then issued under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal dismissed the claim because of non-compliance with the 16 April 2020 order and because the claim had not been actively pursued. No merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 37 after finding that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal order dated 16 April 2020 and had not actively pursued the claim. The tribunal wrote on 27 October 2020 предупрежging that strike out was being considered, gave time to object or request a hearing by 24 November 2020, and received no response. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.