Case 3301845/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Moore (solicitor) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301845/2023
- Decision date
- 13 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hunt Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Watford by CVP on 18 October 2023 before Employment Judge Hunt, found under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant's unauthorised deduction from wages claim was well-founded. The claimant was in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Moore, solicitor.
The tribunal found that Brake Bros Limited failed to pay wages properly payable to Mr S Hudek for the period 1 February 2021 to 31 December 2022. The amount identified in the judgment as the gross sum due was £4,689.33.
No separate remedy breakdown is given in the judgment beyond the unpaid wages figure. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded and that the respondent failed to pay wages properly payable for 1 February 2021 to 31 December 2022 in the gross sum of £4,689.33. | Upheld | — | £4,689 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,689
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.