Case 3301863/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Green v Crossacre Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301863/2023
- Decision date
- 3 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the South East Employment Tribunals on 1 March 2023 and 9 May 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response in time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £7,800. The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £17,130.00.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £24,930.00 in total. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Tynan on 25 August 2023 and sent to the parties on 3 October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £7,800 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £17,130 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,930
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.