Case 3301865/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Turtak v And Metroline Travel Ltd Held by CVP on 29 April 2021 — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301865/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein Statement
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Turtak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr H Turtak brought a claim against Metroline Travel Ltd, heard remotely by CVP on 29 April 2021 before Employment Judge Kurrein. The written judgment records that the hearing was conducted remotely because a face-to-face hearing was not practicable and all issues could be determined by video hearing.
The tribunal's decision is brief. It states that the claimant's claim was not well founded and is dismissed. No separate findings of liability, remedy, or monetary award are recorded in the written extract provided.
The judgment also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No such written reasons are included in the supplied text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that the claim was not well founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.