Case 3301896/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Richard Robinson v CSC Computer Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3301896/2020
- Decision date
- 8 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen
- Venue
- Watford CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Richard Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote hearing at Watford CVP before Employment Judge Allen sitting alone on 29 April 2021. Mr Richard Robinson appeared unrepresented; the respondent, CSC Computer Services Ltd, was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the tribunal had before it a 117-page bundle, Mr Pearson's statement and a skeleton argument.
The tribunal decided that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claims. On that basis, and under Rule 27 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 (as amended to 8 October 2020), all claims were dismissed. No remedy or award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify any monetary award. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claims and dismissed them under Rule 27 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 27 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.