Case 3301896/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Shirley v ME Holdings — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301896/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Shirley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting under Employment Judge Anstis, struck out the claim in case number 3301896/2023. The judgment records that by a letter dated 8 May 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, about why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type or record any merits determination.
The judgment was approved on 22 July 2025 and sent to the parties on 14 August 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant failed to make representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 8 May 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.