Case 3301898/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Muka v Barclays Bank UK plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301898/2025
- Decision date
- 14 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Muka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's public interest disclosure detriment claim and indirect disability discrimination claim. It also dismissed specified allegations of direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability.
The stated reason for dismissing those claims was that the claimant was estopped from bringing them on the basis of the rule in Henderson v Henderson. The judgment also records that direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability claims identified in section 47 of the Case Summary of 14 November 2025 were not dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment dismisses the claimant's claim for public interest disclosure detriment on the basis of estoppel under the rule in Henderson v Henderson. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses the indirect disability discrimination claim on the basis of estoppel under the rule in Henderson v Henderson. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses specified direct disability discrimination allegations concerning delay of a disciplinary hearing, accusations made on 26 June 2023, and withdrawal of laptop access on 9 August 2024. It states that other direct disability discrimination claims identified in section 47 of the Case Summary of 14 November 2025 are not dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment dismisses specified discrimination arising from disability allegations concerning annual review ratings, redundancy selection, and a disciplinary process. It states that other discrimination arising from disability claims identified in section 47 of the Case Summary of 14 November 2025 are not dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Henderson v Henderson
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.