Case 3301900/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Betts, Counsel For the v Zippy Stitch Ltd and others — 2019
- Case reference
- 3301900/2014
- Decision date
- 13 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Betts, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Balogun, sitting alone at London South on 13 November 2019, gave a remedy judgment in the Claimant's favour. No attendance was recorded for the Respondents.
The Tribunal awarded the Claimant £123,000 gross arrears of pay and a further £1,050, being 2 weeks' pay after application of the statutory cap, for the Respondents' failure to provide written particulars of employment. The total sum ordered to be paid was £124,050.
The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal awarded £123,000 gross arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | £123,000 |
| Other | The Tribunal awarded 2 weeks' pay of £1,050 after application of the statutory cap in respect of the Respondents' failure to provide written particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,050 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £124,050
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.