Case 3301900/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Rajalawson v The LK Partnership LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 3301900/2023
- Decision date
- 16 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Rajalawson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningUnder Rule 21, Regional Employment Judge Foxwell Date found that The LK Partnership LLP had made unauthorised deductions from Mrs S Rajalawson's wages and had failed to pay her holiday entitlement. The judgment recorded that the respondent must pay £4,315.01 gross in respect of the wages claim and £6,333.94 in respect of the holiday entitlement claim.
The extracted text also states that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a hearing. Because the judgment itself specifies the two sums above, those figures are recorded as the monetary awards for the two claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £4,315.01 gross. The extracted text also says the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a hearing. | Upheld | — | £4,315 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and must pay £6,333.94. The extracted text also says the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a hearing. | Upheld | — | £6,334 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,649
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.