Mrs B A Lamoureux v Lochace — 2025

Case reference: 3301914/2024
Decision date: 16 June 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Graham Dated

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs B A Lamoureux

Respondent

Lochace

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 4 April 2025, the tribunal gave Mrs B A Lamoureux an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to respond to tribunal correspondence and for not being actively pursued. The judgment records that she did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.

The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination on the underlying merits of the pleaded claims, and it does not record any remedy or award.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing following the letter dated 4 April 2025.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing following the letter dated 4 April 2025.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.