Case 3301925/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Alpay v One Inflight Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3301925/2020
- Decision date
- 19 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Alpay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anstis entered Rule 21 judgment because One Inflight Limited did not present a response. The judgment therefore found in favour of each of the four claimants, Mr M Alpay, Mr M Devereux, Mr R Castex and Mr A Hedger, on unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, breach of contract, holiday pay and unlawful deductions from wages.
The order set claimant-specific sums for the non-unfair-dismissal claims. Mr Alpay was awarded £1,038.00 redundancy pay, £2,250.00 notice pay, £726.92 holiday pay and £1,125.00 unpaid wages. Mr Devereux was awarded £2,462.50 redundancy pay, £4,583.33 notice pay, £1,692.32 holiday pay and £2,291.66 unpaid wages.
Mr Castex was awarded £1,557.00 redundancy pay, £2,250.00 notice pay, £726.92 holiday pay and £1,125.00 unpaid wages. Mr Hedger was awarded £1,000.00 redundancy pay, £2,166.67 notice pay, £1,000.00 holiday pay and £1,083.33 unpaid wages. The judgment also states that a separate order was made in respect of remedy for unfair dismissal, so that remedy figure is not contained in the provided text.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 liability finding entered because the respondent did not present a response. The judgment says a separate order was made in respect of remedy for unfair dismissal, so the remedy amount is not set out in the provided text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Each claimant was found entitled to a redundancy payment. The judgment lists individual awards of £1,038.00 (Mr Alpay), £2,462.50 (Mr Devereux), £1,557.00 (Mr Castex) and £1,000.00 (Mr Hedger). | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that each claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awards notice pay. The listed notice-pay sums are £2,250.00, £4,583.33, £2,250.00 and £2,166.67 respectively for the four claimants. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Each claimant was found to be owed holiday pay. The judgment lists individual awards of £726.92, £1,692.32, £726.92 and £1,000.00 respectively. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found unlawful deductions from wages in favour of each claimant. The listed awards are £1,125.00, £2,291.66, £1,125.00 and £1,083.33 respectively. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.