Case 3301939/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Woods v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3301939/2020
- Decision date
- 16 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr G Woods
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined on the basis of the information before the Employment Judge after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented in time. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
On that basis, the claim for a protective award succeeded. The tribunal stated that the protective award was made in respect of all employees dismissed as redundant on or after 2 January 2020.
The tribunal ordered that the employer pay remuneration for a protected period beginning on 2 January 2020 and lasting 90 days. The Recoupment Regulations were stated to apply. No separate monetary figure was set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and therefore made a protective award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- Recoupment Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.