Case 3301951/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Grabowski v Dnata Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301951/2020
- Decision date
- 2 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Grabowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that an order made on 4 March 2021 stayed the claim for 28 days and required the claimant, by 1 April 2021, to provide a witness statement, any documents relied on, an explanation for failing to engage with and actively pursue the proceedings, and any medical evidence relied on to explain that failure.
The order stated that, unless the claimant complied, the claim would be struck out without a further hearing. The claimant failed to comply with the order and did not make written representations explaining why it could not be complied with. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The strike out judgment does not set out the underlying factual basis of this claim; this classification follows the listed jurisdiction category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The strike out judgment does not set out the underlying factual basis of this claim; this classification follows the listed jurisdiction category. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The strike out judgment does not set out the underlying factual basis of this claim; this classification follows the listed jurisdiction category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The strike out judgment does not set out the underlying factual basis of this claim; this classification follows the listed jurisdiction category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The strike out judgment does not set out the underlying factual basis of this claim; this classification follows the listed jurisdiction category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.