Case 3301953/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F McGrath and others (see schedule) v Volta Trucks Ltd (in administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301953/2024
- Decision date
- 16 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F McGrath and others (see schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis Rule 22 judgment concerned employees dismissed as redundant on 18 October 2023 from the respondent's establishments at Wokingham, Nuneaton, Lighthorne and London, following the appointment of administrators. The judgment records that no fewer than 20 employees were dismissed at each establishment and that 531 employees in total were made redundant immediately on 18 October 2023. The joint administrators filed a response but did not resist the claim.
The tribunal found that there was no recognised trade union or existing body of employee representatives in respect of the redundancies. It further found that the respondent failed to arrange an election of employee representatives and therefore failed to consult with elected representatives before making the claimants redundant. On that basis, the tribunal held that there had been a complete failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
In deciding the length of the protective award, the tribunal referred to GMB v Susie Radin Limited [2004] IRLR 400 and the guidance that the purpose of a protective award is sanction rather than compensation, with the seriousness of the employer's default being the central consideration. The tribunal noted that there had been no consultation at all and that no mitigating circumstances were put forward to justify any reduction. It therefore made a protective award for the maximum period of 90 days beginning on 18 October 2023. The judgment states that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply, but it does not set out a monetary total in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 22 judgment on a complaint that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 TULR(C)A 1992 in relation to collective redundancy consultation. The tribunal made a protective award of 90 days' pay beginning on 18 October 2023, but the judgment text does not state a cash sum for this case. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 TULR(C)A 1992
- s.189(3) TULR(C)A 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Limited [2004] IRLR 400
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.