H Morris v Asghr Nbano Limited — 2023

Case reference: 3301964/2023
Decision date: 24 July 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anstis Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

H Morris

Respondent

Asghr Nbano Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 and entered judgment for the claimant H Morris against the respondent ASGHR NBANO LIMITED. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,369.00.

The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £884.31. No separate basis for either sum was set out in the extracted text beyond the two awards, and no additional remedy components were recorded.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,369.00. The judgment was entered under Rule 21.	Upheld	—	£2,369
Holiday pay	The tribunal held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £884.31. The judgment was entered under Rule 21.	Upheld	—	£884

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £3,253; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.