Case 3301989/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Williams (Friend). For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3301989/2020
- Decision date
- 12 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms T Williams (Friend). For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought two claim forms alleging unfair dismissal and race discrimination. The respondent’s response was filed out of time, but the tribunal accepted it in the interests of justice after noting confusion about the claims and the respondent against which they were brought. The respondent’s case was that there had been a fair disciplinary process leading to termination; the claimant said the dismissal was motivated by race discrimination and whistleblowing.
The tribunal held that the correct respondent was the employer, Greig City Academy, and not the Greig City Academy Trust. The proceedings against the Trust were dismissed because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine them. The claimant had argued that the Trust should remain a party, including by reference to a recording said to relate to the Board of Governors, but that issue was not determined on the merits in this judgment.
The two cases were consolidated and the particulars in both claim forms were to be read together, with case management orders made for further clarification. No findings were made on the substantive unfair dismissal or race discrimination claims, and no remedy was awarded at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Pleaded in the claim forms, but this judgment did not determine the merits of the unfair dismissal claim; it dealt with preliminary jurisdiction, response, and consolidation issues only. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Pleaded in the claim forms, but this judgment did not determine the merits of the race discrimination claim; it dealt with preliminary jurisdiction, response, and consolidation issues only. | Other | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.