Case 3302006/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Moore v Bright Oasis Education Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302006/2025
- Decision date
- 18 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Rule 22 after the response deadline expired on 14 May 2025 and the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto decided on the available material that judgment could properly be entered without a hearing. The order was approved on 6 June 2025 and sent to the parties on 18 June 2025.
The tribunal ordered Bright Oasis Education Limited to pay Mrs A Moore £2,271.60 in total. The sum comprised a redundancy payment of £1,237.50, notice pay of £875, and holiday pay of £159.10. No separate reasons, liability findings, or additional remedies were recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,238 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as notice pay in the judgment; classified as breach_of_contract because the judgment does not label it as wrongful dismissal. | Upheld | — | £875 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £159 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,272
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.