Case 3302016/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Tanya Waite v Reach Care Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302016/2023
- Decision date
- 1 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davey Representation
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Tanya Waite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cambridge on 21 to 22 August 2023 before Employment Judge Davey. The respondent’s name was amended to Reach Care Services Limited. On liability, the tribunal held that Mrs Tanya Waite’s claim for unfair (constructive) dismissal was well founded and that she had been unfairly dismissed by the respondent.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s complaint about failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination of employment was well founded. It recorded that the respondent had already paid £7,333.88 gross in outstanding holiday entitlement, and that this amount would be deducted from the total sum calculated to be outstanding.
Two wage deduction claims were dismissed. The tribunal found that the claim relating to unpaid overtime was not well founded, and the claim relating to underpaid wages during the notice period, identified as 10 February 2023 to 10 May 2023, was also not well founded. The tribunal did not determine the final remedies in this judgment; it stated that remedies would be dealt with at a remedy hearing on 25 October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal held that Mrs Tanya Waite’s claim for unfair (constructive) dismissal was well founded on liability and that she was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the claim for failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination was well founded. It recorded that £7,333.88 gross in outstanding holiday entitlement had been paid and would be deducted from the total amount calculated to be outstanding at remedy. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unauthorised deductions of pay in respect of unpaid overtime was dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unauthorised deductions from pay in respect of underpaid wages during the notice period from 10 February 2023 to 10 May 2023 was dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.