Case 3302024/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Willett v Meditransport Ambulance Service Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302024/2020
- Decision date
- 29 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Willett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Postle issued a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that Mrs G Willett was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,125.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £753.66. A further £600 was ordered in respect of the claimant's loss of statutory rights. The text does not set out any additional remedy components, and no separate basic award or interest is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records an award of £600 in respect of loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal stated that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,125. | Upheld | — | £2,125 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £753.66. | Upheld | — | £754 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,479
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £600
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.