Case 3302035/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Bailey v And Fifth Zone Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302035/2020
- Decision date
- 24 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Bailey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 April 2020 the tribunal wrote to Mr R Bailey saying an Employment Judge was considering striking out his claim because it had no reasonable prospect of success, the reason given being that it had been settled by the parties. He was given until 24 April 2020 either to object to strike-out or to ask for a hearing on the point.
Mr Bailey did not respond to that letter. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records no determination on the substantive merits of the underlying complaint and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after notifying the claimant on 10 April 2020 that strike-out was being considered because the matter appeared to have been settled, and giving him until 24 April 2020 to object or request a hearing. He did not respond. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.