Case 3302056/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Rafal Zuchowicz v TDH Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302056/2020
- Decision date
- 3 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Rafal Zuchowicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP before Employment Judge Alliott sitting alone on 3 February 2021. The claimant, Mr Rafal Zuchowicz, appeared in person and the respondent, TDH Ltd, was represented by its Managing Director, Mr Davit Tumanyan.
The tribunal held that TDH Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's pay. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr Zuchowicz the gross sum of £1,708.06. No other claim types, liability findings, or separate remedy components are set out in the written judgment record.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. No legal test is identified in the extracted text beyond the tribunal's finding of unauthorised deductions from wages.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's pay and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,708.06. | Upheld | — | £1,708 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,708
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.