Case 3302058/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Leon Hall v Oxford City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302058/2025
- Decision date
- 9 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrison Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Leon Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the applicable time limit. It also found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
The tribunal found that the disability discrimination claims were also presented out of time. It concluded, however, that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit, so those claims will proceed. The judgment did not determine the merits of the disability discrimination claims or address remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the disability discrimination claims were not presented within the applicable time limit, but extended time on just and equitable grounds. The claims will proceed, so no final merits outcome was determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.