Case 3302074/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Sprules v Rosemor International Ltd (in liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302074/2023
- Decision date
- 20 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Sprules
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short case management judgment in Mrs G Sprules v Rosemor International Ltd (in liquidation). The tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. Instead, it recorded that the claim had not been actively pursued and that, by letter dated 10 September 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Anstis struck out the claim. No monetary award was made and no substantive findings on liability were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By a letter dated 10 September 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, but she failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.