Case 3302112/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs I Nadeem v Zunera imam and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302112/2023
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs I Nadeem
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs I Nadeem, brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Zunera imam and German Doner Kebab. The tribunal held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required two years' service before an unfair dismissal complaint could be brought, and found that the claimant had been employed for less than two years.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the unfair dismissal complaint could not proceed and struck it out. The claimant was given the opportunity to make representations against strike out and, by email dated 26 March 2023, raised no objection. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claimant had less than two years' service, so she was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was given the opportunity to make representations and raised no objection to strike out by email dated 26 March 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.