Case 3302113/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Reichmann Mr N Smith v Hackett’s Food and Drink Company (Witney) Limited«resp_others» — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302113/2020
- Decision date
- 22 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Reichmann Mr N Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hawksworth made a rule 37 strike-out judgment on 1 June 2021 in relation to the claims brought by Ms J Reichmann and Mr N Smith against Hackett's Food and Drink Company (Witney) Limited. The judgment records no merits findings and simply states that the claims were struck out.
The tribunal had written to the claimants on 19 April 2021 and gave them an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why strike out should not follow because the claims had not been actively pursued. The claimants did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing, so the tribunal struck the claims out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Underlying head inferred from the GOV.UK decision listing; the PDF judgment itself only states that the claims were struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Underlying head inferred from the GOV.UK decision listing; the PDF judgment itself only states that the claims were struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.