Case 3302135/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Porter v OG COMMS Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302135/2024
- Decision date
- 21 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Porter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Porter presented her claim in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 16 February 2024 against OG COMMS Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation). The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided the claim could properly be determined in accordance with rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Miss Porter £535.32 net. No separate split of the award was recorded, and the judgment does not record any further remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal determined under rule 22 that a valid response had not been presented on time and could properly determine the claim in the respondent's absence. | Upheld | — | £535 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £535
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.