Case 3302151/2023 · Employment Tribunal
no attendance For the v Green Energy Together Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302151/2023
- Decision date
- 21 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hunt Appearances
- Venue
- Bury Saint Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
no attendance For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal sat at Bury Saint Edmunds on 1 July 2024 before Employment Judge Hunt. The parties had been sent notice of the hearing and directions, but the Tribunal received no documents and neither party attended the hearing.
The judgment records two claims: unauthorised deduction from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and breach of contract for failure to reimburse expenses. Both claims were dismissed in accordance with Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the case did not proceed in the parties' absence and no material had been filed for the Tribunal to consider.
The decision notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this as a claim of 'unauthorised deduction from wages' under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismisses it under Rule 47 because neither party attended and no documents were received. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim concerned a failure to reimburse expenses and was dismissed under Rule 47 for non-attendance and absence of documents. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.