Case 3302156/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Miah (lay representative) For the v Trinity Pretzels Ltd T/a Auntie Annie — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302156/2024
- Decision date
- 15 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Anderson Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Miah (lay representative) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing. The tribunal heard the claimant's claims for unpaid wages, accrued and unpaid holiday pay on termination, and one week's contractual notice pay. No written reasons were provided beyond the oral judgment recorded in the written decision.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unpaid wages in the gross sum of £1,611.75 for the period 1 November 2023 to 14 December 2023. It also upheld the claim for accrued and unpaid holiday on termination in the gross sum of £614.25.
The tribunal further upheld the claim for failure to pay contractual notice pay of one week in the gross sum of £236.25. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,462.25 in total, less any deductions for tax or national insurance, within 14 days of receiving the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages in the gross sum of £1,611.75 for the period 1 November 2023 to 14 December 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,612 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued and unpaid holiday on termination in the gross sum of £614.25. | Upheld | — | £614 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for failure to pay contractual notice of one week in the gross sum of £236.25. | Upheld | — | £236 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,462
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.