Case 3302172/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Employment tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages claim against The Game Mag Elite Academy
Employment Judge Ord recorded that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from his wages. The tribunal found the amount of the unlawful deductions to be £985.80.
- Case reference
- 3302172/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Hill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after no response had been received from The Game Mag Elite Academy. Employment Judge Ord recorded that Mr C Hill had suffered unlawful deductions from his wages.
The tribunal found the amount of the unlawful deductions to be £985.80. The judgment does not set out any separate breakdown of remedy beyond that figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: no response was received to the claim. Employment Judge Ord recorded that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages in the sum of £985.80. | Upheld | — | £986 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £986
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £986
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.