Case 3302191/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T J Davidson v Trek Highway Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302191/2013
- Decision date
- 2 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T J Davidson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The tribunal also noted that on 19 April 2022 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
On that basis, Regional Employment Judge Foxwell held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of any substantive complaint, and it records no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s). It records a procedural strike out because the respondent company had been dissolved, the claimant had not applied to restore it to the Register of Companies, and the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being invited on 19 April 2022 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for want of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.