Case 3302198/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Carlile v Bedfordshire Fire and Rescue Service — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302198/2025
- Decision date
- 25 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Magee Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Carlile
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Ms M Carlile’s effective date of termination was 24 March 2025. It held that her claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal were presented within the applicable time limit and would therefore proceed. No merits findings were made in this judgment.
The record states that the reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The written judgment therefore only records the limitation decision and does not contain any remedy assessment or substantive liability findings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claim was presented within the applicable time limit and would proceed. This judgment does not determine the merits of the unfair dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held that the claim was presented within the applicable time limit and would proceed. This judgment does not determine the merits of the wrongful dismissal claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.