Case 3302229/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Aldridge v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302229/2020
- Decision date
- 21 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr M Aldridge
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge found that Progress Staffing & Recruitment Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Aldridge's wages. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £8,461.64. The figure was calculated by reference to the claimant's gross weekly wages of £384.62 multiplied by 22 weeks, covering the period from 27 December 2019 to 28 May 2020.
The judgment also treated the claimant's letter of 28 May 2020 as an application to amend the claim to include further unpaid wages up to that date, and the application was granted. The judgment records that the claimant had not been dismissed and had not resigned, so his employment was continuing at the time of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £8,461.64. The claimant's letter of 28 May 2020 was treated as an application to amend the claim to include further unpaid wages to that date, and the application was granted. The judgment records that the claimant remained employed because he had not been dismissed and had not resigned. | Upheld | — | £8,462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,462
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.