Case 3302260/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alan Bailey-Rumney v Thevapeco Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302260/2020
- Decision date
- 26 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alan Bailey-Rumney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto recorded that the respondent, Thevapeco Limited, had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Alan Bailey-Rumney's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £15,038.20 gross in respect of that claim, noting that payment of the net amount would satisfy the judgment debt if the respondent paid the associated tax and national insurance to HMRC.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of entitlement to annual leave. It ordered payment of £1,044.58 for that claim. No further findings, legal tests, or separate remedy breakdown were set out in the extracted judgment text beyond these two liability findings and the two monetary awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The rule 21 judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and orders payment of £15,038.20 gross. | Upheld | — | £15,038 |
| Holiday pay | The rule 21 judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of entitlement to annual leave and orders payment of £1,044.58. | Upheld | — | £1,045 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,083
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.